Why Security Shouldn’t Depend on Politics: Lessons from the Proton–Switzerland Privacy Law Debate
- Mithun GS
- Aug 11
- 3 min read
For years, Switzerland has been seen as the gold standard for digital privacy. Neutral politics, strong constitutional protections, and a history of discretion gave it a reputation as the Fort Knox of data.
Proton Mail — the world’s most recognized privacy-focused email provider — built much of its brand around this “Swiss privacy” reputation. But in 2025, that image is being tested by proposed changes to Switzerland’s surveillance laws, sparking concerns about whether jurisdiction-based trust can truly protect your privacy.
The Swiss Privacy Reputation — and Why It’s Being Tested
Switzerland’s strong privacy laws have long attracted companies in secure communications. Proton Mail leveraged this reputation to position itself as a safe alternative to US-based providers like Gmail and Outlook.
However, new legislation is challenging that image, showing how quickly even “safe” jurisdictions can shift.
What the New Swiss Surveillance Law Proposes
The proposed update to the Ordinance on the Surveillance of Postal and Telecommunications Traffic (VÜPF) significantly expands the scope of surveillance obligations in Switzerland.
Expanded Surveillance Scope
The law would explicitly include encrypted email services, VPN providers, and messaging apps — sectors previously outside the main scope of these regulations.
Real-Time Metadata Access
Authorities could demand real-time access to communication metadata, revealing who contacts whom, when, and how often — even if message content remains encrypted.
Technical Cooperation Requirements
Providers may be compelled to alter systems to facilitate lawful interception, potentially undermining privacy protections.
Proton’s Response to the Swiss Privacy Threat
Proton CEO Andy Yen has strongly criticized the proposal, comparing it to Russian surveillance requirements. He has warned that if the law passes, Proton may have “no choice but to leave Switzerland.”
In a proactive move, Proton is already relocating its AI infrastructure to Germany and Norway — a significant shift for a company whose core branding is tied to Swiss jurisdiction.
The Bigger Lesson: Laws Change, Math Doesn’t
The Proton–Switzerland case is not unique. History shows that even trusted jurisdictions can change rapidly under political or foreign pressure.
Historical Examples of Privacy Erosion
Lavabit (USA, 2013) — shut down after being compelled to hand over encryption keys.
Hong Kong (2020) — privacy protections collapsed after the National Security Law was enacted.
Iceland (2010s–2020s) — shifted data protection stance due to international pressure.
Why Jurisdiction-Based Privacy Is Risky
When your privacy depends on a country’s laws, it’s always one election, court ruling, or treaty away from disappearing.
Protocol Over Politics: Building Privacy That Lasts
True privacy is baked into the protocol, not granted by political goodwill.
Encryption as the Foundation
End-to-end encryption with user-controlled keys.
Dual-layer protection via S/MIME and PGP by default.
Strong Transport and Domain Protections
Enforced DNSSEC, MTA-STS, DMARC, and TLS-RPT to prevent spoofing, interception, and downgrade attacks.
Metadata Minimization
Collect and retain only the minimal necessary metadata, reducing exposure in case of legal demands.
Example: How Metadata Can Still Expose You
Even with encrypted content, metadata can reveal:
Your professional network.
Your travel patterns based on IP data.
If you’re in contact with journalists or political groups.
In the wrong hands, this information can be as damaging as the content itself. The Swiss law changes could make such metadata more easily accessible to authorities.
Takeaways for Privacy-Conscious Users
Look beyond jurisdiction-based marketing.
Understand the difference between content and metadata.
Choose services where privacy survives legal changes.
Where Millionaire.email Fits In
Millionaire.email was designed with the principle that security should not depend on politics. By enforcing the strongest encryption protocols, transport protections, and minimal metadata retention, it ensures privacy remains intact — even if laws change in the hosting country.
Comments